| Unfortunately, the SCA did not avail itself to the reason for the delays in cross examination. The defendants in this case attempted (and successfully managed) to litigate the plaintiff out of funds, being the only reason the plaintiff approached funders in the first place. This seems to be a common practice by big corporations and their legal teams. The SCA's easiest way out of having to apply itself to a case which records ran over 150 000.00 pages, was to rely its dismissal on the lack of expertise, a fact which the court a quo had 262 days better knowledge than the SCA. This case was an absolute travesty of Justice and due to its absolute enormous volume, prevented the matter proceeding to the CC. Perhaps a better knowledge of this case should have been had prior to writing your article. People who were involved in the case would have been able to give you a better assessment of exactly what transpired. The SCA does err, and it did err in this instance. |
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This Message Board accepts no liability of legal consequences that arise from the Message Boards (e.g. defamation, slander, or other such crimes). All posted messages are the sole property of their respective authors. The maintainer does retain the right to remove any message posts for whatever reasons. People that post messages to this forum are not to libel/slander nor in any other way depict a company, entity, individual(s), or service in a false light; should they do so, the legal consequences are theirs alone. Bizcommunity.com will disclose authors' IP addresses to authorities if compelled to do so by a court of law.
