The presidency describes the Du Preez piece as "mind boggling".
"Neither Independent Newspapers nor Du Preez have given the President or the Presidency an opportunity to respond to the serious allegations that are made in the piece which attack the person of the President. This failure to observe such a basic tenet of the journalism trade is disturbing as it is becoming a trend in some sections of the media.
"Du Preez blames the President for the recent suspensions of public servants, the SARS senior managers and recently a senior police official. The institutions of government will, should it be deemed necessary, take action against certain public servants in certain instances. Such action normally forms part of internal disciplinary processes in government departments, which would have nothing to do with the President. The knee jerk reaction of blaming the President for everything that happens in institutions without any attempt to verify the information indicates lazy and mischievous journalism. Opinion makers should undertake research and ensure that their commentary is based on facts and not spread rumours and gossip as Du Preez has done in his piece.
"Du Preez also repeats a lie that Judge Hilary Squires corrected a few years ago. The Judge pointed out that he never said that President Zuma had a corrupt relationship with Shabir [sic] Shaik. The phrase was created by the media and was repeated many times until many people began to believe it was true, flying in the face of fair and truthful reporting. It is mind boggling why Independent Newspapers and Du Preez decided to repeat this lie that has been corrected by the Judge before.
"What is more disturbing is that the piece smacks of prejudice and racism given the manner in which Du Preez describes the President."
Here is the piece that has offended the Presidency... Zuma - SA's one-man wrecking ball.
Sapa quotes IOL as stating: "Independent Media said it noted the presidency's comments.
"Columns and opinion pieces are covered in the press code under comment and the practice is that newspapers are not required to seek a response to comment pieces as long as it passes the test of fair comment," the media group said in a statement.
"We stand by Mr Du Preez and his and our independence in this regard."
